|
|
Post by doubleenderxxl on Jun 20, 2007 20:56:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by wojownik on Jun 21, 2007 0:00:01 GMT
back to old skool pritty insane
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve Gardener on Jun 21, 2007 5:40:30 GMT
Seen this before and that's not the Inch dumbbell.
|
|
|
|
Post by doubleenderxxl on Jun 21, 2007 16:35:24 GMT
Seen this before and that's not the Inch dumbbell. I thought it looked a bit large So that begs the question: Why does he say it is then? Face it, you have been duped into buying a load of Inch 'not quite' replicas LOL |
|
|
|
Post by chrismccarthy on Jun 22, 2007 8:17:43 GMT
Even though that is not the Inch Dumbell, it does come across quite well that Inch was still a skilled lifter even at that age.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve Gardener on Jun 22, 2007 14:48:46 GMT
Even though that is not the Inch Dumbell, it does come across quite well that Inch was still a skilled lifter even at that age. And bullshitter. |
|
|
|
Post by cougarman on Jun 22, 2007 15:19:26 GMT
That bell weighed next to fuck all we have a inch and it it a bastard to clean two haned and i consider myself to be quite strong.
|
|
|
|
Post by doubleenderxxl on Jun 22, 2007 18:04:46 GMT
controversial...
|
|
|
|
Post by chrismccarthy on Jun 22, 2007 18:20:05 GMT
Indeed.
Quite apart from being one of the biggest cons in the history of the iron game (well, if not biggest then certainly one of the most entrenched), this is also a piss poor performance of it, in that the dumbell is so obviously not the actual inch it is not funny. I would guess by this time he no longer had access to any of the baby inches?
Makes me want to go back and read some of Joe Roark's writings on the subject...
|
|
